mapping from get_triples to IRIs

[Mark L.]

When I call onto.get_triples() I see all asserted statements in some coded format (storid's?) like so:

[(303, 6, 80),
 (304, 6, 15),
 (305, 6, 15)]

With onto.graph.dump() I can see how these ids map to IRIs (assuming the order is maintained):

<http://webprotege.stanford.edu/project/9bL9HkeW3Flcuo8Q7VyVjf> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology> .
<http://webprotege.stanford.edu/R14U7ZaRrGMsX2y7Y7ch70> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#AnnotationProperty> .
<http://webprotege.stanford.edu/RCBxNYrhsFVYEF3EWmL664C> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty> .

I would like to be able to easily map from ids as they are represented in get_triples() to full IRIs. There must be a dictionary somewhere tying them together? Or maybe this is happening at the SQLite level?  

[Jiba]

Hi,

These number are storid (store ID). The correspondance is stored in the SQLite database, and possibly cached (depending on the number of storid).

You can use default_world._unabbreviate(storid) to get the corresponding IRI, and default_world._abbreviate(iri) for the reverse operation.

Jiba